OK, back to the war and that
means back to the blog.
In our last few chats we've been discussing the idea of
parallel universes. First of all we considered if the universe we inhabit is infinite. If it is, then the particular collection of
atoms in our solar system must be exactly recreated elsewhere, if you just travel far enough. On average, if you walk about a googolplex steps,
you'll find another identical solar system with another you sitting there
reading this blog (except for the fact that, being identical to you, he also
took off to see what his doppleganger was up to in another part of the infinite
universe).
We talked about string theory
briefly, and how our mathematical laws and constants are, according to string
theory, based on the topology multi-dimensional strings and branes, and that
those topologies allow for, at present, the possibility of around 10500
(that's a one with 500 zeroes after it) different kinds of universes with
physical laws that may differ radically from what we know.
We talked about the quantum multiverse. Evidence shows that
subatomic particles tend to exist as probability waves and when they are
observed, all the other probabilities collapse except for the thing that
actually happens. But what if each of those probabilities doesn’t
collapse? What if, upon observation,
each possibility realizes itself in a parallel universe, and thus billions of
new universes are being created each nanosecond for every single possible
outcome of a quantum event.
The last type of parallel
universe we will discuss is the simulated universe. If you are in tune to pop culture at all, you already know what this is:
Sorry, which pill was which again? |
One of the largest supercomputers in the
world, Blue Gene, is presently doing a passable job of effectively simulating a tiny portion of a rat's brain, about the size of a pinhead. It's modeling about 10,000 neurons comprising
some 10 million neural connections. Big
deal, say you?
Why sure, it's a far cry form
the 100 billion or so neurons we have in our head, comprising trillions of
neural connections and operating at about 100 trillion operations per
second. But when you take into account
the astounding progress in computing ability, the project's leader,
neuroscientist Henry Markram, figures that we'll be effectively modeling a
human brain by about 2023.
Let's keep moving. Let's say that we get a handle on quantum
computing in the next few decades or so.
An effective quantum-based computer the size of a laptop could not only
model a human brain, it could model every thought of every human ever in a
fraction of a second. So computing power
isn't really an issue, barring a zombie apocalypse.
If you've got a machine that can effectively
model a human brain, shouldn't you be able to simulate people? Well, now we're out of the cut-and-dried
world of circuits and into the more ethereal realm of epistemology. Would your simulation think and feel the same
way you do,? Would it be self-aware? Or is their some ineffable quality to
consciousness that lies beyond the ken of mere computation?
This an active and interesting
area of research in epistemology, and one perhaps we'll discuss in a later
Mindfingers post. But let's say for the
time being that, for the purposes of any human interrogation, we cannot
differentiate between you and your simulation.
That is, if we put each of you in a locked room and asked questions by
slipping pieces of paper under the door, there is nothing we could ask that
would allow us to tell you apart from your simulation (known as the Turing Test
for artificial intelligence).
So now we have human mind
simulations that you can't tell from the real thing. After that it would be child's play to
simulate a physical universe for these minds to live in, with stars in the
heavens and gravity and clouds and viruses.
In essence, you've created a parallel universe. Unless you decide to tell the simulated
beings in your model that you are there, they would more or less be in the same
situation we're in--looking around and wondering what they are doing
there. This seems much easier than
creating an actual parallel universe, and the forces involved with that.
If we could create one of these
simulated universes, there is nothing to stop us from creating several. We could play with them and try out different
things. Perhaps, in the future, we could
even find a way to live in them ourselves.
And we might have at some point millions of these simulated universes. A few on every laptop.
So here's the thing. In the vastness of The Is (my name, recall,
for the multiverse), do we honestly think that we are the first life form ever
to become this technologically advanced?
Indeed, it would seem likely to the point of almost certainty that
civilizations elsewhere had or have reached our level of technology and
beyond. And if that's the case, they've
already discovered this idea of simulated universes too. Perhaps millions of intelligences elsewhere
in The Is have already created simulated universes..
Not only that, but these
simulated universes, being more or less perfect-fidelity copies of the real
ones, could have simulated inhabitants that themselves create simulated universes
with simulated inhabitants, who may in turn create their simulated
universes. In this scenario you end up
with simulated universes vastly outnumbering "real" ones.
Following that thread of logic,
if simulated universes are far more probable than real ones, then it follows
that it is far more probable that we ourselves are living in a simulated
universe than a "real" one.
So with our potentially infinite
universe, parallel universes from other Big Bangs, alternate universes possible
in string theory, the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and
simulated universes, we have a vast multiverse beyond our furthest imagining. Infinities upon infinities of universes.
There is only one step
left. What if the multiverse simply comprises
everything. There is nothing that
isn't. No matter how far-fetched your imagining, it is out there right
now. Harry Potter living on Privet
Drive. A universe composed of nothing;
not empty, but nothing. A universe where
pi = 4. A universe like ours, but
running backwards. An entire multiverse
ruled by a omniscient, omnipotent God.
The Is.
If you're interested in this
kind of stuff, I highly recommend Brian Greene's book The Hidden Reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment