In other news, the hotel charged me $3.50 for a to-go coffee this morning. Are you guys kidding me?
So as I’m sitting here watching my socks dry on the radiator
I thought I’d grab the paddles, yell “Clear” and try to bring this damn blog
back from the dead. We’ll see if the it
gets the heartbeat going again or just spikes the EKG before eternal flatline.
It’s not my fault; just my nature. I’m easily distracted by shiny baubles and a
dozen lives stretch out behind me like so many jackets tried on and cast
aside. Adam the Good Student, Adam the
Wayward Teenager, Adam the Bartender Party Animal, Adam the Engineer, Adam the Anarchist,
Adam the Musician, Adam the Government Worker, Adam the Writer and Poet, Adam the
Caver, Adam Goes to Afghanistan, Adam the Boss, Adam the Sporty Dad. So Adam the Philosophical Blogger, was
destined to join the scrap heap with the rest of the outfits I’ve tried on in
search of Me.
Maybe it's like Kurt Vonnegut said, Be careful what you pretend to be, because you are what you pretend to be.
Maybe it's like Kurt Vonnegut said, Be careful what you pretend to be, because you are what you pretend to be.
But enough about me, what do you think about me?
I just finished The
Emperor of all Maladies: A Biography of Cancer, a Pulitzer Prize winner by Siddhartha
Mukherjee. If you want to know how to pronounce his name,
click the link below:
Mukherjee is an
oncologist, so he knows whereof he speaks.
No, I don’t have cancer. Or,
rather, I may have, but I’m not aware of it.
I just have an enduring fascination (keeping in mind that “enduring” for
me means “greater than one year”) with the mechanics of the human cell. I’ve written previously on the subject, specifically
on the fatal relationship between aging and cancer (Mindfingers: Immortality and Cancer).
The book was very good on many levels—the diabolically
difficult task of trying to conquer a disease caused by one of your own cells going
rogue; the politics of the great tobacco company battles of the 60s and 70s;
the hopes of so many “cures” dashed, like radical mastectomies and chemotherapy;
the bleeding edge of genetically engineered drugs.
I was especially interested in the sections on medieval treatment
of cancer, though. They had some funny
ideas back in the Old Days. Not “funny
ha-ha” but “funny-that’s-so-gross-I’m-going-to-hurl-my-supper.” One of these ideas was that the body was made
up of four fluids, or humours: blood, phlegm, yellow bile and black
bile. Any illness was brought about by a
surplus or deficiency of one or more of these humours. No less than Hippocrates (of Hippocratic Oath
fame) popularized this idea, and its sway over medicine continued until the
mid-19th century when the theory of cell pathology became popular. Apparently, the idea predated even ancient Hoppocrates
and can be traced back to the Mesopatamians (Humorism).
Mesopatamian. The only thing harder than that to say drunk
is “No really, I shouldn’t sing karaoke.”
Anyways, enough humour, back to the humours. Too much blood brought about inflammation and
fever. Of course, many wounds and
diseases of the day resulted in inflammation and fever. These people were commonly bled. This resulted, I’m sure, in a higher
mortality rate than the non-bled but nobody ever seemed to notice. One of the reason the bubonic plague of the 1400s was so bad in Europe was that the wretched victims were
bled. In the Muslim lands, boils were
lanced which actually helped. Perhaps occasionally, some gormless traveller from
the East would mention that the Muslims seemed to have a better handle on this
thing, but then he’d be tied to the stake and burned alive as a heretic.
With respect to the Black Plague, the Christians and Muslims
had one thing in common though—they both blamed the Jews. Quel
surprise! Meanwhile a group of particularly observant Christians, the Flagellants,
were literally thrashing themselves to
death daily with iron-studded whips to purge themselves of the sin that caused
the plague. And, not counting the God of
Abraham’s plagues, catapulting plague-riven
corpses into walled cities is perhaps history’s earliest example of biological
warfare. Anyways, the bottom line is
that the Christians, Muslims and Jews were all killing each other, and the Black
Plague was killing all of them indiscriminately. See what I mean about funny. OK, that’s a little dark, but I have no
change of clothes for tomorrow and I’m washing my socks in the sink here. Anyways, where was I?
One of the interesting things is lingering impression
medieval medicine has left on the English language today. A bad balance of humours led not only to
physical pathology but also affected moods and behaviour. Too much phlegm made you sluggish, and today
we have the adjective phlegmatic, meaning “unemotional and calm.” Too much yellow bile put you in a foul mood,
and today we have the word bilious
meaning “unpleasant or ill natured.”
Blood was associated with courage and hope, thus the adjective sanguine (Old French for “blood”)
meaning “confident and optimistic.” Temperament, from the Latin tempere, “to mix”, was the balance of
the humours. And even temperament was a
good balance. Similarly, if your mix was
good at some point you were said to be “in good humour.”
And what of black bile?
It only caused two disorders. One
of them can be guessed from the Greek term for black bile, melan chole:
depression. The other—cancer.
My socks are dry.
No comments:
Post a Comment